engineeringburan

To change the GTK theme in GNOME 3 (with or without GNOME Shell), you can use which is available in the GNOME 3 Ubuntu PPA, official Ubuntu 11.10 and Fedora 15 repositories, etc. If you're using Ubuntu 11.04 and the GNOME 3 PPA or Ubuntu 11.10, run the following command to install it: sudo apt-get install gnome-tweak-tool To be able to use a GTK theme, extract it under /usr/share/themes (for all users) or ~/.themes (if this folder doesn't exist, create it). Then, to change the GNOME3 GTK theme, open Gnome Tweak tool and select the theme you want to use on the 'Interface tab'.

Well I know that is discussed very much on this forums but I want to ask some questions and tell my opinion. Before some days I show GNOME 3 on a laptop for first time. It was amazing. It was so shiny So I made a search about GNOME 3 on FreeBSD. I saw the effort of some people who made it to port it.

Join Grant McWilliams for an in-depth discussion in this video, Customize GNOME 3 desktop, part of Linux: Overview and Installation. Minimal GNOME 3 Install on. I setup the MATE desktop, now it is time to install GNOME 3. >gnome-shell gnome-themes gnome-terminal gnome. GNOME is one of the most popular desktop environments among Linux users today, and a new version, GNOME 3.20 which is the latest version of GNOME 3 was recently released. This article explains desktop themes installation step-by-step for Ubuntu 17.10. First, you need to distinguish between 3 types of theme: GTK Theme, GNOME Shell Theme.

Why all this project just died? The last change was before two years. Is anyone who is serious interested to port GNOME 3 on FreeBSD? As I understood is difficult with a lot of Linuxisms and a lot of ports. But GNOME 2 is dead and GNOME 3 is so nice looking. Mil Spec Monkey Patch Panel. FreeBSD should follow the future and don't stay on the same situation.

There is a huge list of Desktop Environments like Razor-QT, Pantheon Desktop, Cinnamon, GNOME 3,,,, etc but only half of them are ported to FreeBSD as you see. Isn't time to go forward with better Desktop experience? FreeBSD is a server OS and this is his first goal.

I don't disagree with this but FreeBSD desktops are thousands. Not one or two or three.

So shouldn't some things to go further? I don't tell to change his goals or the way his acts. I say to have more options like more Desktop environments, a GUI network manager, a GUI Bluetooth manager and finally an automounter that sees every device we plug just like that. I think one of the problems with a lack of interest is because there's no port in the regular ports tree yet. There is but that does indeed seem to have stopped around 3.6. As I remember GNOME 3 was supposed to be added to the ports tree around 3.0.1-ish already.

But I think one of the major hurdles was getting GNOME 2 and 3 to play nice together in the tree. If I remember correctly they depended on different, incompatible, versions on many of the same dependencies. I for one would welcome a chance to play with 3 but I don't want to see GNOME 2 disappear from the ports tree at the same time. Well to say the truth is buggy and dead.

But: is the GNOME 2 continue so in practice GNOME 2 is not dead. Is like OpenSolaris. Oregon Trail 2 Download Pc Game. But OpenIndiana in fact is OpenSolaris and is still alive. So we could balance between mate and GNOME 3. I believe that almost none uses GNOME 2 anymore and everyone went to Mate Desktop environment. Is really solid and has the same sense with GNOME 2.

In the past, I was a GNOME 2 user and now I am a Mate user and I don't see differences. Same gui, same options. Just Mate is more with the air of today and growing very fast. Houdahgeo Serial on this page. In the other side, GNOME 3 is a Desktop Environment that should exist on ports. Is the Desktop experience of today's technology and is not the only one. Pantheon Desktop and Cinnamon Desktop follows behind.

Also an idea. Why we do not port marcuscom GNOME 3.6 and start step by step to update all ports to finally go to 3.12.